Absorption PROPERTIES

Updated: April, 2004 - M. G. Kamath, Atul Dahiya, Raghavendra R. Hegde

(Haoming Rong)

1. INTRODUCTION

One of the major applications of disposable nonwovens is in absorbent materials, which constitute a broad range of products, ranging from baby diapers, personal hygiene and adult incontinent pads to tampons, paper towels, tissues and sponges. Fig. 1 shows the anatomy of a diaper where the key requirement for absorbent materials at the cover sheet is its ability to imbibe rapidly and hold large amount of fluid under pressure. Absorbency rate and absorbent capacity are the two most important performance parameters to be considered for absorbent applications of nonwovens. The absorbent capacity is mainly determined by the interstitial space between the fibers, the absorbing and swelling characteristics of the material and the resiliency of the web in the wet state. The absorbency rate is governed by the balance between the forces exerted by the capillaries and the frictional drag offered by the fiber surfaces. For non-swelling materials, these properties are largely controlled by the capillary sorption of fluid into the structure until saturation is reached [1]. The absorbency rate and absorbent capacity are affected by fiber mechanical and surface properties, structure of the fabric (i.e., the size and the orientation of flow channels), the nature of fluids imbibed, and the manner in which the web or the product is tested or used [2-7]. Among those factors, the surface wetting characteristics (contact angle) of the fibers in the web and the structure of the web, such as the size, shape, orientation of capillaries, and the extent of bonding, are most important.

Fig. 1: Anatomy of Diaper [10]

The polymer type of the fibers in the fabrics, hydrophilic or hydrophobic, influences the inherent absorbent properties of the fabrics. A hydrophilic fiber provides the capacity to absorb liquid via fiber imbibitions, giving rise to fiber swelling. It also attracts and holds liquid external to the fiber, in the capillaries, and structure voids. On the other hand, a hydrophobic fiber has only the latter mechanism available to it normally [7]. The effect of the small amount of fiber finish (generally 0.1 to 0.5% by weight) is also important since it is on the fiber surface. The particular finish applied on the fiber can significantly change surface wetting property of the fiber.

Fiber linear density and its cross-section area affect void volume, capillary dimensions and the total number of capillaries per unit mass in the fabrics. Fiber surface morphology, surface ruggedness, and core uniformity can influence the absorbency performance to some extent. Fiber crimps influence the packing density of the fabrics and further affect the thickness per unit mass that affects the absorbency of the nonwoven fabrics. The nature of the crimps, whether it is two-dimensional or three-dimensional, also has some effect.

The size of capillaries is affected by the thickness per unit mass and the resiliency of the web, and the size, shape and the mechanical properties of the fibers. The resiliency of the web is influenced by the nature and level of bonding of the fabrics as well as the size, shape, and mechanical properties of the constituent fibers [6].

2. MODELS & EQUATIONS

Models have been built to characterize the two parameters, absorbent capacity (C) and absorbency rate (Q). C (cc/g fluid/g) is given by the volume/mass of fluid absorbed at equilibrium divided by the dry mass of the specimen, while Q is given by the slope of the absorbency curve divided by the dry mass of the specimen. The model to calculate C is based on determining the total interstitial space available for holding fluid per unit dry mass of fiber. The equation is shown as follow [5,6]:

.........(1)

 

Where, A is the area of the web

T is the thickness of the web

Wf is the mass of the dry web

rf is the density of the dry fiber
Vd is the amount of fluid diffused into the structure of the fibers
a is the ratio of increase in volume of a fiber upon wetting to the volume of fluid diffused into the fiber.

In the above equation, "the second term is negligible compared to the first term, and the third term is nearly zero if a fiber is assumed to swell strictly by replacement of fiber volume with fluid volume" [6]. Thus, the dominant factor that controls the fabric absorbent capacity is the web thickness per unit mass on dry basis (T/Wf).

For absorbency rate, the Washburn-Lucas's equation [8,9] is applied.

 

........(2)

 

Where, S is the distance through which the fluid penetrated in time t

r is the mean pore radius of the capillary

gl is the surface tension of the fluid

q is the contact angle of the fiber

h is the viscosity of the fluid

t is the fluid penetrated time

Modifications are given to Washburn-Lucas's equation when applied to the nonwoven webs in which the fluid spreads radially outward from a point in the center. The modified equation is shown as follow:

 

...... (3)

 

Where, r is the mean pore radius of the capillary

gl is the surface tension of the fluid

q is the contact angle of the fiber

h is the viscosity of the fluid

T is the thickness of the web

Wf is the mass of the dry web

A is the area of the web

rf is the density of the dry fiber

In a given web and fluid system, only mean pore radius r and thickness per unit mass (T/Wf) in above equation are not constant. Predicted the value of r by the following equation based on the assumption that a capillary was bound by three fibers, oriented parallel or randomly, and the specific volume of the capillary unit cell equaled that of the parent web [3].

  ............(4)

for ,

 

Where the subscripts 1 and 2 represent different fiber types and

x is a constant with a value of 9x105

d is fiber denier

r is fiber density (g/cc)

f is mass fraction of a fiber in blend (f1 + f2 = 1)

REFFERENCES

  1. L. F. Fryer, B. S. Gupta, Determination of Pore Size Distribution in Fibrous Webs and Its Impact on Absorbency, "Proceedings of 1996 Nonwovens Conference," 1996, pp. 321-327.
  2. Chatterjee, P. K., "Absorbency," Elsevier, New York, 1985.
  3. Gupta, B. S., The Effect of Structural Factors on Absorbent Characteristics of Nonwovens, Tappi J. 71, 147-152 (1988).
  4. Gupta, B. S., and Crews, A. L., Nonwoven: An Advanced Tutorial, "The Effect of Fluid Characteristics in Nonwovens," TAPPI Press, Atlanta, GA, 1989
  5. Gupta, B. S., and Hong, C. J., Changes in Dimensions of Web During Fluid Uptake and its Impact on Absorbency, Tappi J. 77, 181-188 (1994).
  6. Gupta, B. S., Whang, H. S., Capillary Absorption Behaviors of Hydroentangled and Needlepunched Webs of Cellulosic Fibers, "Proceedings of INDA-TEC 96: International nonwovens conference," September 11-13, 1996, Hyatt Regency Crystal City, Crystal City, Virginia, USA.
  7. Gupta, B.S., and Smith, D. K., Nonwovens in Absorbent Materials, Textile Sci. and Technol. 13, 349-388 (2002).
  8. Lucas, R., Kolloid Z., "Ueber das Zeitgesetz des Kapillaren Aufstiegs von Flussigkeiten," 23, 15 (1918).
  9. Washburn, E.W., The Dynamics of Capillary Flow, Phys. Rev. 17(3), 273 (1921).
  10. Gupta, B. S. and L. C. Wadsworth, "Differentially Absorbent Cotton-Surfaced Spunbond Copoplyester and Spunbond PP with Wetting Agent," Proceedings , Seventh Nonwovens Conference at 2004 Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Antonio , TX , January 5-9, 2004 .

 

Back to Table of Contents